Skip to content.

SEACOOS Fall 2006 Workshop

Document Actions

SEACOOS  Fall Workshop: Assessment Planning Meeting

Jacksonville, FL

Monday, 11 September  2006

Workshop Report (Adobe PDF, MS Word, OpenDocument)


Agenda

Purpose: Plan the SEACOOS Year-Five Program Documentation Task and identify potential contributions by SEACOOS to SECOORA.

 

Format: Plenary session with limited presentations and constructive discussion.  Seek frank and open exchange on the topics below; how did SEACOOS work out and what should happen next?

 

Roles:

Presenters:  Provide short PPT to set the scene for group discussions

Facilitators:  Monitor Agenda times and maintain schedules, facilitate discussions

Rapporteurs:  Summarize and report on discussions and PPT presentations

Discussion Leader:  Provide charge and introduce leading questions.

 

0830    Introduction to Workshop, Introduce Documentation Team, and Present Charge to Group--Harvey Seim

 

Part One:   SEACOOS Internal Assessment

0900 to 1040   Working Group Assessments

Facilitator:  Nick Shay

Rapporteur:   Parker Lumpkin

Working Group Presenters:

Observations – Jim Nelson,

Modeling  Cisco Werner

Data Management – Madilyn Fletcher

Outreach WG:  Lundie Spence with Chris Simoniello (previous version)

 

Directions:  Each Working Group Presenter provides a 10 minute PPT overview and leaves 15 minute for facilitator to lead discussion and analyses.   

Overview should have three parts:

Summary of progress, major research findings and “pragmatic lessons learned” in the past 4+ years.  Please place shortcomings or failures in light of our ability to respond to funding, flexibility and progress. (3 PPT slides)

Highlights of any regional and/or national contributions to IOOS (1 PPT slide), with emphasis on those that could form significant elements of R-COOS and/or IOOS implementation.

Actions taken in response to the External Evaluation Document (no rebuttals) —(1 PPT slide)  EED website:   http://seacoos.org/documents/evaluation

NOTE: presenters are allocated a total of 5 PPT slides to discuss in 10 min.

 

1040 to 1110 – Coffee Break

 

1110 to 1200 - Overview of SEACOOS structure

Facilitator:  George Voulgaris

Rapporteur:   Parker Lumpkin

Presenter:  Harvey Seim

 

Review of “pragmatic lessons learned” in operating and managing a COOS Pilot Program—

(including governance, ONR liaison, regional and federal affiliates; fiscal management—Sarah Smith), etc.  )– 10 minutes for presentation and 40 minutes for discussion 

SEACOOS Lessons Learned

 

1200 to 1230 -  Overview of Total Contributions of the SEACOOS and related programs  to the national IOOS/COOS effort

Facilitator:  George Voulgaris

Rapporteur:   Parker Lumpkin

Presenter:  Madilyn Fletcher

Provide examples of aggregation, interoperability, interfacing, integration, etc – 10 minutes for presentation; 20 minutes for discussion.

Operating a Pilot RCOOS

SEACOOS Interoperability

IOOS Conceptual Plan (with talking points)

ORION update

US Ocean Action Plan

 

1230 to 1400 Lunch

 

Part Two:  Year Five Plans

 

1400 to 1500 – Documentation Plan Outline and Process

Facilitator:  Bob Bacon

Rapporteur:  Chris Simoniello

Presenter:  Harvey Seim

 

How to summarize, assess and report Year 1-5 procedures, progress and results.

This will result  in a preliminary  list of existing documents to be revised and an outline of revisions, and identification of what new documents need to be created

10 minutes of presentation and 50 minutes of discussion

Documentation Effort

 

1500 to 1530 – Coffee Break

 

1530 to 1630 – Potential SEACOOS contributions to the implementation of SECOORA

Facilitator:  Bob Bacon

Rapporteur:  Chris Simoniello

      Discussion Leader:  Jim Sanders

Introduction to include some insight and thoughts prepared in advance to lead discussion from the entire group.

This will result in a list of important contributions from all aspects of the SEACOOS program (e.g., research, applications, operations, planning) and group consensus on how SEACOOS partners would like to participate in SECOORA.

NOTE: We need both scientific/scholarly and practical rationales – why are we doing this?

Towards a RCOOS Design for SECOORA

Explorer of the Seas Evaluation

Red Tide Tracking  (with drifter animation)

 

1630 to 1730 – Wrap-up

Facilitator:  Bob Bacon

Rapporteur:  Chris Simoniello

            Working Group Panel: 

Obs:  Bob Weisberg

Modeling:  Chris Mooers

Data Management:  Harvey Seim

E&E:  Lundie Spence

 

Outcome will be a synthesis from the perspective of each panelist’s WG in light of the day’s discussion; in other words, what do they think it all means as we move forward with the SEACOOS documentation and SECOORA implementation?  Final comments/inputs from the broader group.


1730  Adjourn

 

Charge to the Rapporteurs:   in the evening, combine their notes with the various PPTs to form a draft workshop report to submit to the Documentation Team for review.