SEACOOS Fall 2006 Workshop
SEACOOS Fall
Workshop: Assessment Planning Meeting
Workshop Report (Adobe PDF, MS Word, OpenDocument)
Purpose: Plan the SEACOOS Year-Five
Program Documentation Task and identify potential contributions by SEACOOS to SECOORA.
Format: Plenary session with limited
presentations and constructive discussion.
Seek frank and open exchange on the topics below; how did SEACOOS work
out and what should happen next?
Roles:
Presenters:
Provide short PPT to set the scene for group discussions
Facilitators:
Monitor Agenda times and maintain schedules, facilitate discussions
Rapporteurs:
Summarize and report on discussions and PPT presentations
Discussion Leader:
Provide charge and introduce leading questions.
0830
Introduction to Workshop, Introduce Documentation
Team, and Present Charge to Group--Harvey
Seim
Part
One: SEACOOS Internal Assessment
0900 to 1040
Working Group Assessments
Facilitator: Nick Shay
Rapporteur: Parker Lumpkin
Working Group
Presenters:
Observations – Jim Nelson,
Modeling – Cisco
Werner
Data Management – Madilyn Fletcher
Outreach WG:
Lundie Spence with Chris Simoniello (previous version)
Directions: Each Working Group Presenter provides a 10
minute PPT overview and leaves 15 minute for facilitator to lead discussion and
analyses.
Overview should
have three parts:
Summary of progress, major research findings and “pragmatic
lessons learned” in the past 4+ years.
Please place shortcomings or failures in light of our ability to respond
to funding, flexibility and progress. (3 PPT slides)
Highlights of any regional and/or national
contributions to IOOS (1 PPT slide), with emphasis on those that could form
significant elements of R-COOS and/or IOOS implementation.
Actions taken in response to the External
Evaluation Document (no rebuttals) —(1 PPT slide) EED website:
http://seacoos.org/documents/evaluation
NOTE:
presenters are allocated a total of 5 PPT slides to discuss in 10 min.
1040 to
1110 – Coffee Break
1110 to 1200 - Overview of SEACOOS
structure
Facilitator: George Voulgaris
Rapporteur: Parker Lumpkin
Presenter: Harvey Seim
Review of “pragmatic lessons learned” in operating and managing
a COOS Pilot Program—
(including governance, ONR liaison, regional and federal affiliates;
fiscal management—Sarah Smith), etc. )– 10
minutes for presentation and 40 minutes for discussion
1200 to 1230 - Overview of Total Contributions of the SEACOOS
and related programs to the national IOOS/COOS
effort
Facilitator: George Voulgaris
Rapporteur: Parker Lumpkin
Presenter: Madilyn Fletcher
Provide examples of aggregation, interoperability, interfacing, integration, etc – 10 minutes for presentation; 20 minutes for discussion.
IOOS Conceptual Plan (with talking points)
1230 to
1400 Lunch
Part Two: Year
Five Plans
1400 to 1500 – Documentation Plan Outline and
Process
Facilitator: Bob Bacon
Rapporteur: Chris Simoniello
Presenter: Harvey Seim
How to summarize, assess and report Year 1-5 procedures,
progress and results.
This will result in
a preliminary list of existing documents
to be revised and an outline of revisions, and identification of what new
documents need to be created
10 minutes of presentation and 50 minutes of discussion
1500 to 1530 – Coffee Break
1530 to 1630 –
Potential SEACOOS contributions to the implementation of SECOORA
Facilitator: Bob Bacon
Rapporteur: Chris Simoniello
Discussion Leader: Jim Sanders
Introduction to include some insight and thoughts prepared
in advance to lead discussion from the entire group.
This will result in a list of important contributions from
all aspects of the SEACOOS program (e.g., research, applications, operations,
planning) and group consensus on how SEACOOS partners would like to participate
in SECOORA.
NOTE: We need both scientific/scholarly and practical rationales – why are we doing this?
Towards a RCOOS Design for SECOORA
Explorer of the Seas Evaluation
Red Tide Tracking (with drifter animation)
1630 to 1730 –
Wrap-up
Facilitator:
Bob Bacon
Rapporteur: Chris Simoniello
Working Group Panel:
Obs: Bob Weisberg
Modeling: Chris Mooers
Data Management: Harvey Seim
E&E: Lundie Spence
Outcome will be a synthesis from the perspective of each panelist’s WG in light of the day’s discussion; in other words, what do they think it all means as we move forward with the SEACOOS documentation and SECOORA implementation? Final comments/inputs from the broader group.
1730 Adjourn