V1, 7/18/05
11
mechanism is the provision of raw and processed data directly to users. To
enlarge this activity we must first identify additional/specific user groups and what
is needed to best present data/information to them. Initially we have identified
the modelers and the educators as two user groups that we have started to work
with. The new Teams approach as recently adopted will help to improve on
these matters raised. It is also necessary to ensure utility for users by making
sure that the web site provides reliable access, which requires switching over to
a back up site during power failures due to unforeseen events, e.g. hurricane
impacts.
· The Committee recommends that SEACOOS member scientists (modelers,
observationalists
) be viewed as one of the primary test user groups. Through
internal governance mechanisms SEACOOS can require that its members 1) be
users of the SEACOOS IM system in the daily conduct of their own research and
other tasks; and 2) provide regular, constructive feedback to the SEACOOS data
managers in order to shed light on those aspects of the IM system requiring
enhancement.
As SEACOOS moves into routine analysis, model data assimilation and
validation we will utilize SEACOOS IM to provide access to the observations.
We understand what SEACOOS IM can do to facilitate access to SEACOOS
data for all SEACOOS members, as well as potential users outside SEACOOS.
In that way, we can design the Information Management system so that it
actually facilitates information access and is preferentially selected by the
scientists within and without SEACOOS.
· The SEACOOS IM strategy recognizes the importance of data standards. A clear
and largely successful effort has been made to investigate the existing, relevant
data standards and to utilize them. In some (most) cases the existing standards
have fallen short of meeting SEACOOS needs in significant details. In order to
remedy those deficiencies SEACOOS has independently drafted new documents
and proposed them as standards (e.g. Data Dictionary and SEACOOS CDL).
Although the standards drafted are of high quality, SEACOOS must engage in
community-wide efforts to define data standards.
The Committees recommendations regarding data standard development are
excellent and totally consistent with our near-term planning. There are at least
three primary groups that we need to interface with to ensure that are SEACOOS
developments are consistent with larger standards development initiatives.
These are (1) the Cooperative Ocean/Atmosphere Research Data Service
(COARDS; http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/people/julia.collins/coop/ , a NOAA/university
cooperative for the sharing and distribution of global atmospheric and
oceanographic research data sets ; (2) the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC;
http://www.opengeospatial.org/ ), non-profit, international, voluntary consensus
standards organization working on development of geospatial and location based
services standards, and (3) the Marine Metadata Interoperability Initiative (MMI;